Is seniority and attendace is the main criteria for promotion in the ladder to WM

Is seniority and attendance the main criteria for promotion in the ladder to WM?

In Freemasonry, while seniority and attendance are important factors, they are not the sole criteria for promotion to the position of Worshipful Master (WM). As discussed in the paper 'Old Tiler Talks', the election of officers can often be influenced by popularity and the perceived ability to lead rather than just by seniority or attendance records. The Old Tiler states, "The good of the lodge is more important than the reward for the man." This indicates that the qualities of the individual and their ability to serve the lodge effectively can outweigh mere attendance or time served in previous positions.

Moreover, the dynamics of lodge politics can also play a significant role in these decisions, as noted in the same paper, where a brother expressed frustration over the election of a less dedicated member over a more committed one due to popularity. Thus, while seniority and attendance are valued, they are part of a broader set of considerations that include leadership qualities and the needs of the lodge.