FreemasonryGPT

what do the four principal banners represent in the royal arch and do writers agree on them

4 of 5 Royal ArchsymbolismastrologyMackeyWilmshurst

The four principal banners display the devices of the lion, the ox, the man, and the eagle 13. Writers draw on different traditional and mystical systems to explain their significance, yielding tribal, elemental, astrological, and psychological interpretations.

In the historical and tribal arrangement, the banners represent the four leading tribes of Israel: Judah (lion), Ephraim (ox), Reuben (man), and Dan (eagle) 1. Albert C. Mackey notes that writers historically disagreed on the colors and heraldry of these standards; while he favors the Talmudic scheme assigning white to Judah, scarlet to Ephraim, purple to Reuben, and blue to Dan, he observes that the Targumic commentators linked the colors to the High Priest's breastplate, and Laurence Dermott assigned golden yellow and blue fields based on Masonic armorial blazonry 1.

Jaime Paul Lamb offers an astrological and elemental reading, identifying the four figures as the classical tetramorph corresponding to the four elements—Fire (lion), Earth (ox), Air (man), and Water (eagle)—as well as the four fixed signs of the zodiac: Leo, Taurus, Aquarius, and Scorpio, which was anciently associated with the eagle 2. This celestial configuration corresponds to the position of the equinoxes and solstices during the Taurian Age, aligning with the Masonic epoch of Anno Lucis 2.

W. L. Wilmshurst provides an allegorical interpretation, treating the four standards as a glyph illustrating the evolution of the human soul 3. In his view, the figures outline a journey from the passional wild-beast stage (the lion and ox), through disciplined service and human rationality (the man), culminating in upward-soaring spirituality (the eagle) 3.

2

where does the cherubim reading come from

The connection between the four figures depicted on the banners—the ox, lion, man, and eagle—and the Cherubim originates in the vision of the prophet Ezekiel in the Hebrew Scriptures 12. In Ezekiel 1:10 and 10:14, the Cherubim are described as four-faced composite beings possessing the faces of a man, a lion, an ox, and an eagle 12. A parallel vision occurs in the Book of Revelation (4:6–8), which describes the "Four Living Creatures," later referred to in artistic and symbolic tradition as the Tetramorph 2.

From an archaeological and historical standpoint, Albert C. Mackey notes that the biblical concept of the Cherubim traces back to ancient Semitic and Assyro-Babylonian imagery 1. Cuneiform records reveal that the term *cherub* derives from the Semitic root *karab* (or *kirubu*), referring to colossal winged bulls with human heads that guarded the gateways of temples and royal palaces in Chaldea and Assyria 1. Scholars observe that the Israelites of the monarchical and prophetic periods envisioned the Cherubim in this winged, multi-featured composite form 1.

In modern astrological and esoteric readings, Jaime Paul Lamb traces the symbolic origins of these four forms back to the fixed signs of the zodiac—Taurus (the ox), Leo (the lion), Scorpio (anciently associated with the eagle), and Aquarius (the water-bearer or man) 2. When aligned with the precessional calendar during the Taurian Age around 4000 BCE—the era corresponding to the Masonic reckoning of *Anno Lucis*—these four zodiacal houses hosted the two equinoxes and two solstices 2. Consequently, writers view Ezekiel's Cherubim and the Tetramorph on the banners as zoomorphic representations of these celestial positions and seasonal cardinal points 2.

3

did mackey and waite agree on it

Albert C. Mackey bases his reading of the four principal banners on Talmudic commentary, associating the lion, ox, man, and eagle with the four leading tribes of Israel—Judah, Ephraim, Reuben, and Dan 1. He considers this rabbinical scheme, which assigns white to Judah, scarlet to Ephraim, purple to Reuben, and blue to Dan, to be the only dependable framework for the banners in the American Rite 1. Furthermore, he views the tabernacle veils bearing these standards as symbolic obstacles representing the trials encountered in the pursuit of divine Truth 1.

The available sources do not include A. E. Waite's writings or interpretation of the banners and Cherubim, so whether he agreed with Mackey cannot be established from the provided text.

4

what about the twelve smaller banners

The twelve smaller banners represent the twelve tribes of Israel, as presentations in Royal Arch Chapters explain, as the United Grand Lodge of England notes. These standards depict the individual emblems and devices traditionally associated with each of the twelve patriarchal lines: Judah, Issachar, Zebulun, Reuben, Simeon, Gad, Ephraim, Manasseh, Benjamin, Dan, Asher, and Naphtali.

While the principal banners correspond to the four leading encampments of Israel, the twelve smaller standards delineate the complete tribal organization surrounding the Tabernacle. Detailed commentary or debate among historical Masonic writers regarding alternative symbolic readings for these twelve individual banners is not contained in the available literature.

Written by AI. It can make mistakes — check anything that matters against the sources listed.

1 follow-up left in this thread

This thread is getting long. A fresh one often reads better — and the library is the same either way.

Share on WhatsApp New thread Recent

Where to go next

Each opens a thread of its own.

Preparing the Working Tools…