What is the opinion on Rite of Memphis y Mizraím?

Arthur Edward Waite offered a severe condemnation of the Ancient and Primitive Rite, describing it as characterized by shallow metaphysical principles and outright mendacity 1. Waite criticized the historical claims presented in the Rite's ritual instruction—such as attributing its origin to the plains of Tartary, tracing its lineage through Dionysian Artificers and the Essenes, and asserting that its ark preserved secrets directly from the temples of Thebes and Eleusis—as manufactured history, concluding that the system was primarily "a study in the whole art of lying" 1.

In contrast, Albert C. Mackey recorded the official characterization of the Rite as published in its journal, The Kneph, issued by its Sovereign Sanctuary 2. Under this self-representation, the Rite framed itself as universal, open to any Master Mason in good standing under a constitutional Grand Lodge, and dedicated to teaching the Fatherhood of God and the Brotherhood of Man 2. Mackey noted that the body governed ninety-five degrees divided into three series, which were rearranged and renamed at various points in its history 2.